USPTO serial 78279935
CONTENT ALARM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3091670Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 9, 2006
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CONTENT ALARM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Mateo, CA
San Mateo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott A. Ouellette
Scott A. Ouellette EMC Corporation176 South StreetLegal DepartmentHopkinton, MA 01748Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software that uses linguistic analysis to monitor the transmission of sensitive digital content and provides instant visibility into sensitive information in outgoing network traffic | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 24, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |