USPTO serial 78280160
V VALENTINO RUDY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with V VALENTINO RUDY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne Hiaring, Esq.
ANNE HIARING ESQ LAW OFFICE OF ANNE HIARING19 BROOKMONT CIRSAN ANSELMO, CA 94960-1412UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of these materials and not included in other classes, namely attaché cases, billfolds, calling card cases, change purses, coin purses, cosmetic bags sold empty, cosmetic cases sold empty, credit card cases, key cases, leather key chains, lipstick cases, wallets; animal skins, hides; trunks and traveling bags, suitcases, garment bags for travel, luggage, luggage tags, overnight bags, shoe bags for travel, hat boxes for travel, carry-on bags, duffel bags,; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; whips, harness and saddlery; Bags and other items belonging to this class, namely, handbags, tote bags, book bags, briefcases, clutch bags, fanny packs, all purpose sport bags, all purpose athletic bags, beach bags, daypacks, diaper bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |