USPTO serial 78280179
FOODIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOODIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirt S. O'Neill
KIRT S ONEILL AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD, LLPPO BOX 12870SAN ANTONIO, TX 78212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Newsletters distributed through applicant's retail grocery stores on the topics of goods and services offered at applicant's retail grocery stores | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail grocery store services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing newsletters via e-mail to applicant's grocery store customers on the topics of goods and services offered at applicant's retail grocery stores | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 23, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |