USPTO serial 78280487
PSP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PSP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Antony C. Edwards
ANTONY C EDWARDS PETRAROIA LANGFORD EDWARDS & RUSH800-1708 DOLPHIN AVEKELOWNA, BC V1Y 9S4CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | bullet-resistant hard and soft body armour, namely, bullet resistant panels, stab resistant panels, combination stab/ballistic resistant panels, concealable vests, outer vests, rescue vests, tactical vests, load-bearing vests, military vests, fragmentation vests, combination ballistic/flotation vests, medical and paramedic protection vests, bullet-resistant jackets, rapid entry vests, carriers for bullet-resistant vests; hard armour for bullet resistant vests and clothing, namely, plates; trauma pads; protective helmets; ballistic blankets for protective purposes; fire resistant blankets; explosion containment blankets; bomb suits, humanitarian demining suits, mine search suits; nuclear biological chemical warfare protective clothing; protective and/or fire resistant clothing products, namely, balaclavas, pants, jackets, rainwear, overalls, coveralls, flight suits and shirts for use by the military, police, fire departments, public safety, utility, petrochemical and industrial workforces | ACTIVE | Feb 5, 2002 |
| 010 | soft-sided and semi-rigid medical kits, consisting of replaceable hard-bottom inserts, cases and pouches fitted for all of the following - plastic and rubber gloves, medical instruments, medical syringes, medications, medicine vials, life resuscitating equipment, namely, oxygen cylinders, airway management kits, respirators, defibrillators, intubations supplies, diagnostic supplies, first aid kits, pouches for holding hot and cold packs; medical oxygen bottle carrier and deployment systems comprised primarily of transport unit, wall mount, cot mount, bag and hook accessories for securing bottled oxygen to building structure walls, interiors of vehicles and aircraft, and on portable stretchers, all for use by emergency medical personnel, search and rescue and law enforcement first responders; bullet resistant jackets | ACTIVE | Feb 5, 2002 |
| 018 | backpacks; firearm accessories, namely, unloading stations for firearms | ACTIVE | Feb 5, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |