Drawing for SPORTING WOOD

USPTO serial 78280533

SPORTING WOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPORTING WOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lea Hall Speed

LEA HALL SPEED BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN & CALDWELL165 MADISON AVE STE 2000MEMPHIS, TN 38103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Knives, namely hunting knives and knives for hobby use, spears, billy clubs, swords; fireplace tool sets sold as a unit; cutlery, namely forks, spoons and knivesACTIVE—
009Protective body shieldsACTIVE—
011Flashlights; electric lighting fixturesACTIVE—
013Gun cases, blow guns; tripod, bipod and monopod stands for firearmsACTIVE—
016Bookends, letter openers; temporary tattoos; pens; calendars; stationary; pen and pencil holdersACTIVE—
018Animal skins, leather and animal hides, sold individually; gym bags, sportsman's hunting bags, and bag tags for use on traveling bags; leather hunting and shooting accessories, namely, cartridge holders, canes, walking sticks, shooting sticks in monopod, bipod, and tripod form for use as a binocular rest; umbrellas; toiletry cases, sold empty; leather key chainsACTIVE—
020Furniture, namely book cases, coat racks, folding tripod stools, non-metal hat racks, display cases and display racks, armoires, entertainment centers, tables, chairs, wall-mounted gun racks and free standing gun racks, benches, desks, non-metal boxes and wood boxes, picture frames, shelves, display racks for floor and walls, figurines and non-metal cabinet hardware all comprised of wood, horn, antler, tusk and/or bone; animal tusks, horns and antlers, sold individually and/or mounted for display; pillows comprised of animal skins; folding chairs; non-metal and non-leather key chainsACTIVE—
021Housewares, namely candle holders not of precious metal, bottle openers, salt and pepper shakers, coasters not of paper and not being table linen, serving spoons, servicing ware for servicing food and cutting boards all comprised of wood, horn, antler, bone, tusk, animal hides and/or fabric; mugs, drinking glasses, insulating sleeve holders for beverage cans, portable beverage coolersACTIVE—
024Blanket throws comprised of animal skinsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely hats, shirts, jackets, pullovers, shorts, gloves, T-shirts, fleece pullovers, visors, vests, sweatpants, sweatshirts; safari jackets; hunting clothing, namely vests, gloves, hats, shorts and jacketsACTIVE—
028Sporting goods, namely hunting and archery bows and arrows; baseball bats; balls, namely basketballs and baseballs; toy sporting equipment sold as a unit for playing indoor and outdoor games, namely basketball goal sets and miniature baseball games; foam balls, namely footballs, baseballs and basketballs; hunting and archery bow casesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 7, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 4, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 17, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 25, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 14, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 14, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 26, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 30, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance