USPTO serial 78280578
PRIME TIME PILATES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRIME TIME PILATES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South Pasadena, CA
South Pasadena, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel R. Kimbell
DANIEL R KIMBELL CHRISTIE PARKER & HALE LLPPO BOX 7068350 W COLORADO BLVD STE 500PASADENA, CA 91109Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRE-RECORDED VIDEO TAPES AND VIDEO DISCS FEATURING HEALTH, WELLNESS AND EXERCISE TOPICS AND PILATES EXERCISE PROGRAMS, SEMINARS ON PILATES EXERCISE PROGRAMS FOR GENERAL HEALTH, TRAINING AND RECOVERY FROM SPORTS INJURY AND VARIOUS ILLNESS AND DISEASES INCLUDING CANCER, AND THE USE OF EXERCISE EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING WORKSHOPS AND SEMINARS IN THE FIELDS OF EXERCISE TRAINING, MUSCLE STRENGTHENING, AND RECOVERY FROM INJURY, ILLNESS AND DISEASE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 4, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |