USPTO serial 78280579
FUDGE FACTORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUDGE FACTORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Doctrow
MICHAEL A DOCTROW MCNEES WALLACE & NURICK100 PINE STHARRISBURG, PA 17108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | cookies | ABANDONED | Oct 30, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AHOLD RETAIL SERVICES AG
- Other trademarks owned by AHOLD RETAIL SERVICES AG
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Ahold N.V., Zaandam, Geneva Royalties Branch
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named FUDGE FACTORY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |