USPTO serial 78281566
COLORADO VNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COLORADO VNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Trenner, Esq.
MARK D TRENNER TRENNER LAW FIRM LLC12081 W ALAMEDA PKWY #163LAKEWOOD, CO 80228UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | professionally installed building automation computer hardware, namely metal fabricated consoles and enclosure for building automation | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | professionally installed building automation computer hardware, namely, building automation controls for security, lighting, and interior climate control; structured electric wires for building automation; audio and video devices for building automation; building automation computer hardware, namely, building automation appliance control apparatus; building automation computer hardware, namely, remote system access devices for building automation; LAN (local operating network) hardware for building automation; building automation computer hardware, namely, network repeaters for building automation, network signal boosters for building automation, network bridging apparatus for building automation, data protocol adapters for building automation, keypads, touch screen panels, LCD displays, computer sensors and sensor interfaces all for building automation; building automation computer hardware, namely communications servers for building automation, key fob transmitters and computer base stations for building automation; computerized badge readers for security use in building automation | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | professionally installed building automation computer hardware, namely, controls for security, lighting and interior climate control all for building automaton | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | professionally installed building automation computer hardware, namely plastic fabricated consoles and enclosures for building automation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Colorado vNet, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named COLORADO VNET
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |