USPTO serial 78281574
TORREGAZATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - SLIE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TORREGAZATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1300 Tomelloso (Ciudad Real), ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip Furgang
Philip Furgang Furgang & Adwar, L.L.P.2 Crosfield Avenue, Suite 210West Nyack, NY 10994UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | WINE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 20, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 5, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |