USPTO serial 78282163
SHOPPING.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHOPPING.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria Eliseeva
MARIA ELISEEVA HOUSTON ELISEEVA LLP4 MILITIA DR STE 4LEXINGTON, MA 02421UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing information about the goods and services of others via a global computer network featuring compilation of products and services, retailer locations, product description and comparative information, real time price comparisons, product availability, discounts and promotions, product features, product ratings, purveyor ratings and evaluations, customer product and purveyor reviews; promoting the sale of goods and services of others via a global computer network with hypertext links to product and service purveyors for the purpose of purchasing products and services; providing information about retailers via a global computer network | ACTIVE | Oct 16, 2003 |
| 042 | Providing a search engine for generating customized web pages in response to the user requested information about the goods and services of others | ACTIVE | Oct 16, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |