Drawing for Serial No. 78282252

USPTO serial 78282252

Serial No. 78282252

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2912937Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 21, 2004
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78282252?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Adams

MICHAEL D. ADAMS MAYER BROWN LLP71 South Wacker DriveCHICAGO, IL 60606-4637UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042[ Rental of software and hardware for online access; services of an internet trust center, namely, assurance and administration of digital keys and/or digital certificates; computer programming for others, namely, generation of data processing programs; web page hosting services; ] hosting computer software applications for others, hosting of digital content on the internet; [ hosting the websites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; consulting and design services in the fields of information technology, computer programming, and global communication networks; ] installation, maintenance and repair of computer softwareSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2015C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jun 24, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 16, 2015C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jun 16, 2015ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2011NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2011C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 3, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 21, 2011E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 28, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 28, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 20041.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Jul 14, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 9, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance