Drawing for EMMET

USPTO serial 78282311

EMMET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3214655Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 6, 2007
Examiner
WILLIS, PAMELA Y
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with EMMET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Hoists, lift equipment, namely, power-operated lifting equipment, namely, fork lifts, hydraulic hand stackers; jacks, namely, hydraulic jacks, power jacks, power-operated jacks, air-operated hydraulic jacks, air/hydraulic transmission jacks, spiral jacks, bottle jacks; lift machines, namely, power-operated lifting and moving equipment, fork lifts and chain blocksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2016NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2016RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Aug 10, 201689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Aug 9, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 19, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
May 19, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2012NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 20128.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Apr 10, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 11, 2012ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 25, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 11, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 1, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 18, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 18, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 17, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 21, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 12, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance