Drawing for DIGEPLAYER

USPTO serial 78282410

DIGEPLAYER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGEPLAYER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James K. Lee

JAMES K LEE DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE1501 FOURTH AVE STE 2600SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services and/or online retail store services featuring handheld hard disk drive-based unit for playing movies, video programs, voice recordings and music, head phones, electrical power supplies and connection cables for use with the handheld hard disk drive-based unitACTIVE—
041Rental of handheld hard disk drive-based units for playing movies, video programs, voice recordings and music and related head phones, electrical power supplies and connection cables for use with the handheld hard disk drive-based unit; entertainment services, namely, providing audio programs featuring music, sports, talk, news and data via satellite and via global communication networkACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for playing movies, video programs, voice recordings and musicACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 6, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 14, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 20, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 5, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 5, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance