CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for VIFI

USPTO serial 78283223

VIFI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3000727Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 27, 2005
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with VIFI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jessica Stone Levy

DAVID A COHEN HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC101 COLUMBIA RDMORRISTOWN, NJ 07962UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009security, monitoring and surveillance systems comprised of video cameras, decoy video cameras, digital video cameras, wireless digital video cameras, networked digital video cameras, video camera housing assemblies, decoy video camera housing assemblies, video tape recorders, digital video recorders and video monitors; and parts and accessories therefor, namely, wiring harnesses, mounting hardware, and camera carrying bags; and components for security, monitoring and surveillance systems, namely video cameras, decoy video cameras, digital video cameras, wireless digital video cameras, networked digital video cameras, video camera housing assemblies, decoy video camera housing assemblies, video tape recorders, digital video recorders and video monitors; and parts and accessories therefor, namely, wiring harnesses, mounting hardware, and camera carrying bagsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 17, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Nov 4, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 28, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 27, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 2, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 9, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance