USPTO serial 78283332
DENVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DENVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEWART J BELLUS
STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD AND ROE1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | CIGARETTES, TOBACCO, MATCHES, AND SMOKER'S ARTICLES, NAMELY, CIGARETTE HOLDERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, CIGARETTE CASES NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, ASHTRAYS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, MATCHBOXES NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL AND LIGHTERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, not including cigars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 25, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |