USPTO serial 78283379
BY REQUEST SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BY REQUEST SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOAN L LONG
JOAN L LONG MAYER BROWN ROWE & MAW LLPPO BOX 2828CHICAGO, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer programming services for others and production of data processing programs for others; consulting in the field of telecommunication, rental of software and hardware for online access; services of an internet trust center, namely, assurance and administration of digital keys and/or digital certificates; rental of data processing equipment; generation of data processing programs; professional consultancy in the field of data processing; web page hosting services; operating electronic information networks; consulting and design services in the field of information technology, computer programming, telecommunications and global communication networks; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software;; computer programming services for others and production of data processing programs for others; consulting in the field of telecommunication, rental of software and hardware for online access; services of an internet trust center, namely, assurance and administration of digital keys and/or digital certificates; rental of data processing equipment; generation of data processing programs; professional consultancy in the field of data processing; web page hosting services; operating electronic information networks; consulting and design services in the field of information technology, computer programming, telecommunications and global communication networks; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |