USPTO serial 78283423
PURIFYSHAMPOO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 31, 2004
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PURIFYSHAMPOO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
New York, NY
Irvine, CA
Irvine, CA
Irvine, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa M Gigliotti
Lisa M Gigliotti L'OREAL USA CREATIVE, INC.575 FIFTH AVENUEFLOOR 34NEW YORK, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, [ HAIR SHAMPOOS ] * HAIR SHAMPOO * | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 21, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by L'OREAL USA CREATIVE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PUREOLOGY RESEARCH, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PUREOLOGY RESEARCH, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PureOlogy Research, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PureOlogy Research, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named PURIFYSHAMPOO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2005 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |