USPTO serial 78283433
QUICK 8
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUICK 8?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Doran J. Ingalls
DORAN J INGALLS FASKEN MARTINEAU DUMOULIN LLPSTE 21001075 W GEORGIA STVANCOUVER BRITISH COLUMBIA CANADA,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Online entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring casino services and fantasy casino services in the field of virtual horse races featuring the option to have the computer randomly select eight horses upon which bets are made; and lottery services based on virtual horse racing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 6, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |