Drawing for SHRIMP TONIGHT

USPTO serial 78283478

SHRIMP TONIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHRIMP TONIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Kim

NANCY O DIX DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US LLP4365 EXECUTIVE DR STE 1100SAN DIEGO, CA 92121-2133UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029SeafoodACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 22, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 22, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 16, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 13, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance