USPTO serial 78283488
CYBERSOFT COMPUTING SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CYBERSOFT COMPUTING SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Conshohocken, PA
Conshohocken, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
JEFFREY A. SMITH MILLEN WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD., STE. 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Distributorships in the field of computer software including security software, forensics software, systems management software, utility software, operating system programs and utility programs for messaging and file sharing; On-line retail store services featuring computer software including security software, forensics software, systems management software, utility software, operating system programs and utility programs for messaging and file sharing; Retail store services in the field of computer software including security software, forensics software, systems management software, utility software, operating system programs and utility programs for messaging and file sharing; Retail services by direct solicitation by sales agents in the field of computer software including security software, forensics software, systems management software, utility software, operating system programs and utility programs for messaging and file sharing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consultation services in the fields including security and utility applications, forensics software, systems management programs, operating system programs and utility programs for messaging and file sharing; Computer software consultation services in the fields including security and utility applications, forensics applications, systems management programs, operating system programs and utility programs for messaging and file sharing; Consulting services in the fields of design, selection, implementation and use of computer software systems for others in the fields including security and utility applications, forensics applications, systems management programs, operating system programs and utility programs for messaging and file sharing; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems in the fields including security, forensics and utility software, systems management programs, operating system programs and utility programs for messaging and file sharing; Maintenance of computer software in the fields including security and utility applications, forensics applications, systems management programs, operating system programs and utility programs for messaging and file sharing; Integration of computer systems and networks in the fields including security and utility applications, forensics applications, systems management programs, operating system programs and utility programs for messaging and file sharing; Consultation services in the field of forensics; Forensic investigation services relating to computers and security | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |