USPTO serial 78283495
ORESTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHAM, LANA H
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORESTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chapel Hill, NC
Chapel Hill, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher E. George
CHRISTOPHER E. GEORGE FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY120 LASALLE STREET SUITE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF PAIN AND INFLAMMATORY DISORDERS; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF MIGRAINE HEADACHES AND HEADACHES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |