USPTO serial 78283868
NORTHBASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2961133Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 7, 2005
- Examiner
- VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NORTHBASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Daly City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward S. Hammerman, Esq.
EDWARD S HAMMERMAN ESQ HAMMERMAN PLLCSTE 4405335 WISCONSIN AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20015-2052Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail services by direct solicitation by sales agent, featuring computer software licenses to organize patient medical records, and computer-based medical dictation and transcription services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2003 |
| 042 | On site and Internet-based technical consultation and technical support services for computer software used in the medical market and medical field, namely, providing back-up computer programs and facilities, monitoring of network systems, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |