Drawing for CORELESS

USPTO serial 78283970

CORELESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3437501Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 27, 2008
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORELESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond Rundelli

Raymond Rundelli Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLPThe Calfee Building1405 East Sixth StreetCLEVELAND, OH 44114-1607

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Valves for vehicle and trailer braking systemsSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMar 14, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2014C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Aug 26, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 19, 2014C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Aug 19, 2014ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
May 27, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 21, 2008REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 14, 2008CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Apr 2, 2008SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 14, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 14, 2008EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 4, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 4, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 7, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 16, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 16, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 16, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 5, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 14, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 16, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 14, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 14, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 1, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 15, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 12, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 1, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2003FAXXFAX SENT—
Sep 24, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance