USPTO serial 78283970
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC
Elyria, OH
Other trademarks owned by Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC
Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC
Elyria, OH
Other trademarks owned by Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC
Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC
Elyria, OH
Other trademarks owned by Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond Rundelli
Raymond Rundelli Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLPThe Calfee Building1405 East Sixth StreetCLEVELAND, OH 44114-1607| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Valves for vehicle and trailer braking systems | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Mar 14, 2008 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2014 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |