USPTO serial 78283972
TOP LEVEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOP LEVEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Bay Village, FL
North Bay Village, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GILBERT LEE SANDLER
GILBERT LEE SANDLER SANDLER TRAVIS & ROSENBERG PA5200 BLUE LAGOON DR STE 600MIAMI, FL 33126UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | cigars, cigarettes, stogies, tobacco, smoking pipes, smoking pipe cleaners, smoking pipe racks, smoking ashtrays of non-precious metal, cigar cutters, cigarette paper, matches, cigarette filters, cigarette lighters of non precious metal, flints for lighters, gas containers for cigarette lighters, cigarette cases and holders of non precious metal for the aforesaid goods; smokeless tobacco | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |