Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78284229?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78284229. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns MICRO-CLEAR?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78284229, the listed owner(s) include: Alex C. Fergusson, Inc., Alex C. Fergusson, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78284229?

Serial number 78284229 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark MICRO-CLEAR. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover MICRO-CLEAR?

The public record lists International Classes: 001, 003, 007, 011, 040. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: MICRO-CLEAR Serial# 78284229 | status 606; last event ASCK | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

Q: What is the current status of MICRO-CLEAR?

MICRO-CLEAR (78284229) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICRO-CLEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles N. Quinn

CHARLES N QUINN FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP10TH FL2000 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-3291

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
001	Poultry processing chemicals, namely, chemical additives for use in manufacturing poultry	ACTIVE	—
003	Poultry processing chemicals, namely, chemicals for cleaning to maintain sanitary conditions in poultry processing	ACTIVE	—
007	Equipment for poultry processing, namely, cutting machines, shaping machines, packaging machines	ACTIVE	—
011	Equipment for poultry processing, namely, food chillers and coolers, sterilizers for non-medical purposes, food pasteurizes	ACTIVE	—
040	Poultry processing to the order and specification of others	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Feb 12, 2009	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Oct 29, 2008	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Aug 13, 2008	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2008	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2007	EX5G	SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED	—
Nov 26, 2007	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Nov 21, 2007	EXT5	SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED	—
Jul 30, 2007	EX4G	SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED	—
Jul 9, 2007	PGEX	PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED	—
May 29, 2007	PETL	COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER	—
May 29, 2007	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
May 24, 2007	EXT4	SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED	—
Apr 30, 2007	EX3G	SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED	—
Apr 2, 2007	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Apr 2, 2007	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Feb 1, 2007	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2007	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2006	EXT3	SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED	—
Aug 8, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
May 25, 2006	EX2G	SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	—
May 1, 2006	EXT2	SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED	—
May 1, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Dec 14, 2005	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Nov 18, 2005	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Nov 18, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
May 24, 2005	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 1, 2005	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 9, 2005	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Nov 10, 2004	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Nov 8, 2004	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Oct 30, 2004	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Oct 25, 2004	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Aug 12, 2004	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jul 28, 2004	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Jul 28, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jul 26, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 26, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jan 22, 2004	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—

MICRO-CLEAR