USPTO serial 78285124
LITTLE MISS MATCHED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LITTLE MISS MATCHED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan S. Nemes
Alan S. Nemes Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP720 Olive Street, Suite 2400St. Louis, MO 63101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Accessories, namely, bandanas, belts, earmuffs, gloves, mittens, muffs, scarves, suspenders, sweatbands and wristbands; beachwear, namely, bathing suits, bathing trunks and beach coverups; clothing, namely, aprons, blouses; clothing of imitation leather and leather, namely, gloves, mittens, earmuffs, suspenders, wristbands, footwear, dresses, coats, jackets, jeans, jumpers, jumpsuits, pants, shirts, shorts, skirts, suits, trousers, headwear and vests; costumes, dresses, gabardines, gowns, jeans, jerseys, jumpers, jumpsuits, knitwear, overalls, pants, pullovers; rainwear and waterproof clothing, namely, raincoats, rain boots, rain jackets and rain suits; shirts, shorts, short sets comprised of a bottom and top, skirts, smocks, socks, stockings, suits, sweaters, sweatpants, sweatsuits, tanktops, T-shirts, trousers, uniforms and vests; footwear, namely, athletic footwear, bath sandals, bath slippers, beach shoes, boots, clogs, galoshes, sandals, shoes, slippers and slipper socks; head wear, namely, caps, hats, headbands, hoods and visors; infant wear; lingerie, lounge wear and underwear, namely, bathrobes, bodices, bras, camisoles, chemistries, corsets, dressing gowns, hosiery, pantyhose, slips and tights; neckwear; sleep wear; outerwear, namely, coats, jackets, parkas, ponchos, raincoats, shawls and stoles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 25, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |