Drawing for GAYLORD OPRYLAND TEXAS

USPTO serial 78285128

GAYLORD OPRYLAND TEXAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GAYLORD OPRYLAND TEXAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Reber M. Boult

REBER M BOULT STOKES BARTHOLOMEW EVANS & PETREE, PASTE 2800424 CHURCH STNASHVILLE, TN 37219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035providing facilities for business meetings; retail store services, namely retail shops featuring candy, snacks, magazines, books, flowers, jewelry, golf equipment, golf apparel, and golf accessoriesACTIVE—
041entertainment services in the nature of golf tournaments and golf related events, namely, banquets, award ceremonies and exhibitions; providing fitness facilities; golf courses; country clubs; entertainment services, namely, live musical performances, dramatico-musical programs and musical programs; providing facilities for educational conventions; night club servicesACTIVE—
043hotel services; resort lodging services; providing general purpose convention facilities; arena services, namely providing facilities for conventions and exhibitions; providing banquet and social function facilities for special occasions; restaurant services; food catering services; bar services; cocktail lounge servicesACTIVE—
044barber shop and beauty salon services; health spa services, namely, cosmetic body care servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 17, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 2, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance