Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78285274?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78285274. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns C & C CALIFORNIA BY CHEYANN & CLAIRE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78285274, the listed owner(s) include: Stansfield, Claire, C&C CALIFORNIA, INC., Benedict, Cheyann.

What is USPTO serial number 78285274?

Serial number 78285274 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark C & C CALIFORNIA BY CHEYANN & CLAIRE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of C & C CALIFORNIA BY CHEYANN & CLAIRE?

C & C CALIFORNIA BY CHEYANN & CLAIRE (78285274) currently shows USPTO status code 601 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover C & C CALIFORNIA BY CHEYANN & CLAIRE?

The public record lists International Classes: 025, 035. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: C & C CALIFORNIA BY CHEYANN & CLAIRE Serial# 78285274 | status 601; last event MAB1 | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with C & C CALIFORNIA BY CHEYANN & CLAIRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Stansfield, Claire
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by Stansfield, Claire
C&C CALIFORNIA, INC.
LOS ANGELES, CA
Other trademarks owned by C&C CALIFORNIA, INC.
Benedict, Cheyann
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by Benedict, Cheyann

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gene Bolmarcich

GENE BOLMARCICH LIZ CLAIBORNE INCONE CLAIBORNE AVEHQ2 7SNORTH BERGEN, NJ 07047

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
025	Clothing made of 100% cotton, namely, layered t-shirts, shirts, dresses and pants in bold colors	ACTIVE	Jan 1, 2003
035	Retail services featuring clothing made of 100% cotton, namely, layered t-shirts, shirts, dresses and pants in bold colors	ACTIVE	Jan 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Dec 20, 2005	MAB1	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT	—
Dec 20, 2005	ABN1	ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED	—
Dec 20, 2005	EXAR	TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED	—
Dec 6, 2005	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Dec 6, 2005	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Nov 28, 2005	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 26, 2005	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 30, 2005	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2005	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Jul 13, 2005	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
May 9, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
May 2, 2005	UNPR	UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED	—
May 2, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Apr 18, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 17, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 24, 2005	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Jan 24, 2005	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Jan 24, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Nov 15, 2004	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 2004	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 15, 2004	UNPR	UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED	—
Apr 15, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Feb 27, 2004	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—

C & C CALIFORNIA BY CHEYANN & CLAIRE