USPTO serial 78285299
GENOME VALLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3230448Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 17, 2007
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GENOME VALLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Telegana 5, IN
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, IN
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, IN
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan A. Menkes
Jonathan A. Menkes KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF BIOTECHNOLOGY; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF BIOTECHNOLOGY; AND EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONFERENCES, WORKSHOPS AND EXHIBITIONS IN THE FIELD OF BIOTECHNOLOGY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 16, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Government of Telangana
- Other trademarks owned by The Government of Andhra Pradesh
- Other trademarks owned by The Government of Andhra Pradesh
- Other trademarks owned by The Government of Andhra Pradesh
- Other trademarks in Class B
- Similar marks named GENOME VALLEY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2018 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Jul 5, 2017 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |