USPTO serial 78285567
CLEAR PERSPECTIVES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLEAR PERSPECTIVES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Michael Hurst
J MICHAEL HURST DINSMORE & SHOHL, LLP1900 CHEMED CTR 255 E FIFTH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care preparations, namely, shampoos, conditioners, mousses, gels, styling lotions and creams, non-medicated scalp shampoos, hair sprays and spritzes, temporary or permanent waving and curling preparations, dyeing and coloring preparations; Skin care preparations, namely, cleansers, moisturizers, toners, masks, astringents for cosmetic purposes, body and face exfoliants for cosmetic purposes and makeup removers; Cosmetic preparations, namely, foundation, concealers, powder, blusher, eye shadow, eye liner, mascara, eyebrow pencil, lip color, lip gloss and lip base; Suncare tanning, sunscreen and after-sun preparations, namely, lotions, creams, gels, oils, sprays and non-medicated lip balms; Bath care preparations, namely, cleansers, moisturizers, gels, foams, oils and non-medicated salts; Nail preparations, namely, nail color preparation, nail polish, nail base coat, nail top coat, nail drying preparations, nail saving preparations in the nature of a bonding agent, nail cleansing preparations to prepare the nail for polish, nail grooming products in the nature of acrylic powders and bonding liquids, nail polish removers; Personal care products, namely body cleansers, moisturizers, body oils, powders, deodorants, antiperspirants, toilet water, perfumes and colognes, massage oils and lotions, shaving gels, shower gels and after shave lotions and creams | ACTIVE | Jun 18, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |