CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for METALSMITHS MASTER ARCHITECTS OF JEWELRY

USPTO serial 78285568

METALSMITHS MASTER ARCHITECTS OF JEWELRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3207296Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 13, 2007
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with METALSMITHS MASTER ARCHITECTS OF JEWELRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul C. Van Slyke

Paul C. Van Slyke Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP600 Travis Street3400 JPMorgan Chase TowerHouston, TX 77002-3095

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewelry; costume jewelry, precious metal and non-precious metal jewelry, jewelry with and without precious gemstones, precious gemstomes, semi-precious gemstones, jewelry namely rings, earrings, bracelets, bangles, wrist bands, necklaces, pendants, ornamental pins, brooches and body jewelry, jewelry namely sterling silver jewelry, jewelry incorporating precious or semi-precious stones, watches, beads for use in the manufacture of jewelry, pearlsSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
035Retails shops, mail order services, telephone shop at home and on-line retail store services featuring jewelry, retail shop at home party services featuring jewelry, and retail jewelry storesSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Dec 10, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 21, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 13, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 25, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 9, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2004FAXXFAX SENT—
Jul 26, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 4, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance