USPTO serial 78285710
GOOD CHARLOTTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOOD CHARLOTTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Apolzon
LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |