USPTO serial 78285733
PLAYMAN SUMMER GAMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLAYMAN SUMMER GAMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Francis J. Duffin
KATHERINE C SPELMAN COBALT LLP819 BANCROFT WAYBERKELEY, CA 94710UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software for communication devices; computer game software and programs enabling users to play games with mobile phones and personal digital assistants; computer software and programs enabling users of communication devices to simultaneously access databases and global computer networks; software enabling transfer of data between mobile communication apparatus ; Computer game software for communication devices; computer game software and programs enabling users to play games with mobile phones and personal digital assistants; computer software and programs enabling users of communication devices to simultaneously access databases and global computer networks; software enabling transfer of data between mobile communication apparatus | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, computer games provided via network between communications networks and computers, providing on-line computer games; providing on-line games, interactive games and video games from databases on web sites, a global computer information network, and from mobile and cellular phones and personal digital assistants; Entertainment services, namely, computer games provided via network between communications networks and computers, providing on-line computer games; providing on-line games, interactive games and video games from databases on web sites, a global computer information network, and from mobile and cellular phones and personal digital assistants | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |