USPTO serial 78285756
SPYNIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPYNIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas F. Dunn
THOMAS F DUNN PENDLETON, PCSTE 2051601 TRAPELO RDWALTHAM, MA 02451Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for the measurement, capture and monitoring of specific wireless performance parameters of wireless local area network communications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 20, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 4, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |