USPTO serial 78286059
GREAT AMERICAN TOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GREAT AMERICAN TOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CAROL DESMOND
JON A DORF DORF & KARLEN LLP740 W BOSTON POST RD STE 302MAMARONECK, NY 10543-3345UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOYS AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, DOLLS AND DOLL ACCESSORIES, DOLL CLOTHING, DOLL HOUSES, DOLL HOUSE FURNITURE AND FURNISHINGS; FLYING DISCS; GAMES, NAMELY, AUTOMATIC GAMES OTHER THAN COIN-OPERATED AND THOSE ADAPTED FOR USE WITH TELEVISION RECEIVERS AND MARBLES GAMES; MOBILES; PLAY BALLOONS; PLUSH TOY ANIMALS AND SOFT SCULPTURES; PRACTICAL NOVELTY JOKES; PUPPETS; SHUTTLECOCKS; SKATEBOARDS; SPINNING TOPS; TOY PISTOLS; TOY SCOOTERS; TOY VEHICLES; AND TOYS FOR DOMESTIC PETS SPORTING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, BALLS, BATS AND ATHLETIC AND BOXING GLOVES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |