USPTO serial 78286160
EYELIKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3125610Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 8, 2006
- Examiner
- WEIMER, CAROLINE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EYELIKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
JENOPTIK Laser, Optik, Systeme GmbH
D-07745 Jena, DE
Other trademarks owned by JENOPTIK Laser, Optik, Systeme GmbH
JENOPTIK Laser, Optik, Systeme GmbH
D-07745 Jena, DE
Other trademarks owned by JENOPTIK Laser, Optik, Systeme GmbH
JENOPTIK Laser, Optik, Systeme GmbH
D-07745 Jena, DE
Other trademarks owned by JENOPTIK Laser, Optik, Systeme GmbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JENNIFER D. SILVERMAN
Jennifer D. Silverman Pryor Cashman LLP7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital cameras, photographic apparatus, namely, medium format cameras, view cameras, tripods, single-lens reflex (SLR) cameras, flash instruments, lenses; photographic reproduction apparatus and instruments, namely, flashlights, continuous lights, reproduction stands and tripods; electric and electronic measuring instruments for distances and for optical apparatus and aerial photography, sensors, namely, optical, electronic, optoelectronic, photo-electrical sensors; illuminators for photography, namely, flash lights, incandescent and fluorescent bulbs and accessories therefore; computer printers; printers, namely, inkjet, laser and thermo-sublimation machines; computers; pre-press stage equipment, namely, imagesetters/photoplotters, computer programs for use in image editing, camera controlling, photography, graphics, printing and pre-press stages, archiving | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JENOPTIK Laser, Optik, Systeme GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by JENOPTIK Laser, Optik, Systeme GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by JENOPTIK Laser, Optik, Systeme GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named EYELIKE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 16, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |