USPTO serial 78286162
HUXLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HUXLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PERLA M. KUHN
PERLA M KUHN REED LLPONE BATTERY PARK PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | Artificial turf and components of artificial turf sold as a unit therewith; golf mats and matting | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Operation of physical fitness centers, gyms, and recreation and sports facilities for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Installation, maintenance and repair of artificial turf and components of artificial turf installation, maintenance and repair of artificial sport surfaces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |