USPTO serial 78286246
BEYOND THE SCOPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEYOND THE SCOPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Rosini, Esq.
James E. Rosini, Esq. Kenyon & Kenyon LLPOne BroadwayNew York, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MEDICAL AND SURGICAL PRODUCTS, NAMELY, CANNULA, SPHINCTEROTOMES, NEEDLE KNIVES, EXTRACTION BALLOON, STONE RETRIEVAL BASKETS, MECHANICAL LITHOTRIPTERS, BILIARY AND PANCREATIC STENTS; STENT INTRODUCER SETS, NAMELY, PUSHING CATHETER, GUIDE CATHETER, AND GUIDE WIRE INCLUDED IN SET, BIOPSY FORCEPS, CYTOLOGY BRUSHES, LOOP CUTTER, GRASPING FORCEPS, RETRIEVAL BASKETS; CLIP FIXING DEVICE, NAMELY, CLIPS, INJECTION NEEDLES; ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION KITS FOR UPPER AND LOWER GI, NAMELY, ENDOSCOPE CAP, SNARE, SPRAY CATHETER AND NEEDLES, WHICH COMPRISE THE KIT; GRASPING FORCEPS; CYTOLOGY CURETTES; ASPIRATION BIOPSY NEEDLES; BRONCHIAL CANNULA; ELECTROSURGICAL ACCESSORIES,NAMELY, HOT BIOPSY FORCEPS; COAGULATION ELECTRODES; ELECTROSURGICAL KNIVES; ENTEROSCOPIC ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, HEAT PROBES, SNARES, HOT BIOPSY FORCEPS, INJECTION NEEDLES, COLD FORCEPS; CHANNEL CLEANING BRUSH; SPRAY CATHETERS; SURGICAL SCISSORS; CLEANING BRUSHES; ELECTROSURGICAL ADAPTORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SERVICES FOR MEDICAL AND SURGICAL PRODUCTS, NAMELY, CANNULA, SPHINCTEROTOMES, NEEDLE KNIVES, EXTRACTION BALLOON, STONE RETRIEVAL BASKETS, MECHANICAL LITHOTRIPTERS, BILIARY AND PANCREATIC STENTS; STENT INTRODUCER SETS, NAMELY, PUSHING CATHETER, GUIDE CATHETER, AND GUIDE WIRE INCLUDED IN SET, BIOPSY FORCEPS, CYTOLOGY BRUSHES, LOOP CUTTER, GRASPING FORCEPS, RETRIEVAL BASKETS; CLIP FIXING DEVICE, NAMELY, CLIPS, INJECTION NEEDLES; ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION KITS FOR UPPER AND LOWER GI, NAMELY, ENDOSCOPE CAP, SNARE, SPRAY CATHETER AND NEEDLES, WHICH COMPRISE THE KIT; GRASPING FORCEPS; CYTOLOGY CURETTES; ASPIRATION BIOPSY NEEDLES; BRONCHIAL CANNULA; ELECTROSURGICAL ACCESSORIES,NAMELY, HOT BIOPSY FORCEPS; COAGULATION ELECTRODES; ELECTROSURGICAL KNIVES; ENTEROSCOPIC ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, HEAT PROBES, SNARES, HOT BIOPSY FORCEPS, INJECTION NEEDLES, COLD FORCEPS; CHANNEL CLEANING BRUSH; SPRAY CATHETERS; SURGICAL SCISSORS; CLEANING BRUSHES; ELECTROSURGICAL ADAPTORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Olympus America, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Olympus America, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named BEYOND THE SCOPE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 3, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |