USPTO serial 78286622
ADOM FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3257672Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 3, 2007
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ADOM FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Smith TMCP-UCL
Robert Smith TMCP-UCL UConn IPLaw clinic222 Pitkin St.East Hartford, CT 06108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Edible oil, namely, palm concentrate and palm oil, [ palm kernel oil coconut oil; ] steamed whole egg plant; [ dairy-based chocolate food beverages; vegetable-based chocolate food beverages; ] mackerel in tomato sauce; mackerel in tomato and chili sauce; mackerel in brine; all natural peanut butter for peanut butter soup; pepper puree; [ tomato and ] pepper puree; [ corned beef ] and spiced corned beef; [ fish; prepared entrees consisting primarily of fish, poultry, meat or vegetables; snack foods, namely, plantain chips, potato chips, yam chips, cassava chips; ] roasted peanuts; [ roasted peanuts covered in honey; roasted peanuts and mixed nuts; ] atieke made from cassava; fufu made from potato granules and cassava starch, [ both being flour products; ] pounded yam made from potato granules and cassava starch, both being flour products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 2, 1993 |
| 030 | African specialty foods, namely, banku; corn meal, namely, kenkey and gourmet kenkey; corn meal entrees consisting of polenta, kenkey, and gourmet kenkey; cassava flour; gari; [ bread; pastries; cookies; ] white corn meal; white corn flour; [ yellow corn meal; yellow corn flour; rice flour; potato starch; cassava starch; flour ground from black eyed peas; ] spices, namely, white pepper, red hot pepper, crushed red pepper, black pepper, powdered ginger, [ whole and ground nutmeg, ] curry, garlic, [ natural sea salt, whole and ground egusi, and allspice; hot sauces; cocoa and prepared cocoa-based beverages; chocolate candies; chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; chocolate cookies; breakfast cereal in the nature of ground roasted corn, namely, Tom Brown; breakfast cereal in the nature of ground roasted corn with spices namely, Housa koko; spiced rice, namely, joloff rice; ] hot sauces namely, hot and mild gourmet sheto, hot and mild sahara sauce; [ and all purpose seasoning ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 2, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ACKEIFI, JOHN W.
- Other trademarks owned by ACKEIFI, JOHN W.
- Other trademarks owned by ACKEIFI, JOHN W.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named ADOM FOODS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 3, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 26, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |