Drawing for IDENTITY SAFEGUARDS

USPTO serial 78286737

IDENTITY SAFEGUARDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FISHER, HANNAH
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IDENTITY SAFEGUARDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Troy D. Greenfield

Troy D. Greenfield Bullivant Houser Bailey PC1601 Fifth AvenueSuite 2300Seattle, WA 98101-1618

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035provision of membership identity theft prevention, protection and recovery services, namely, monitoring consumer credit reports and providing participants with weekly credit alerts and yearly credit reports, as well as, in the event participants become victims of identity theft, referral to recovery advocates, fraud investigators, legal counsel and other experts necessary to develop and execute recovery plansABANDONED—
036Provision of membership identity theft prevention and protection services, namely, providing participants with customized financial protection plans and identity theft prevention counselingABANDONED—
045provision of membership identity theft prevention and protection services, namely, financial identity monitoringABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 1, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 1, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 7, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 5, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 9, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 23, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 17, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 15, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 14, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 10, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance