USPTO serial 78287333
DOMINATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DOMINATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL A. BONDI
MICHAEL A BONDI GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY & BENNETT PAPO BOX 2906MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0906UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | MOTORCYCLE PARTS, NAMELY, FITTINGS AND FILTERS FOR OIL LINE PUMP AND TANK, FLANGE BOLTS; STRUCTURAL PARTS, NAMELY, UPPER FORK BRACKETS, FRONT FORK BRACKETS, ADJUSTABLE FRONT FORK BRACKETS, REAR FORKS, REAR FORK PROTECTOR PLATES, CHROME FRAME INSERTS, UNDER SEAT FRAME COVERS, REAR FENDER BRACES; REAR FENDER CLAMPS, SLIP CLAMPS HIGHWAY BARS, STANDS AND STAND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY STAND LEG STOPS, STAND ANGLE PLATES, MOUNTING HARDWARE, LIFTS, FOOTREST ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, FOOTREST STUDS, FLIP UP FOOTBOARDS, REAR BUMPER ASSEMBLIES, SADDLEBAG GUARDS, SUPPORTS, HANDLEBAR RISER ADAPTORS, RISER BOLTS AND CLAMP SCREWS; SHOCK ABSORBER AND SUSPENSION PARTS, NAMELY FORK SLIDER TUBES, DAMPER ROD EXTENSIONS, STUD NUTS, AND STUDS; TRANSMISSION AND BRAKE PARTS, NAMELY, FORWARD CONTROLS AND FORWARD CONTROL SHIFTERS, SHIFT FORK ALIGNMENT GAUGE, MAIN SHAFT THRUST WASHERS, COUNTERSHAFT PARTS AND GEAR END WASHERS,TRANSMISSION ROLLERS AND TRANSMISSION STAND, THROW OUT BEARINGS, FILL PLUGS WITH DIPSTICKS TRANSMISSION FASTENERS, COVERS AND MOUNTS, BELT DRIVES AND REPLACEMENT BELTS AND PULLEYS, DRIVE BELT GUIDE PLATES, BELT DRIVE IDLER BEARINGS, BELT DRIVE REPLACEMENT PARTS, BELT DRIVE CLUTCHES, PRIMARY DRIVE COVERS, FASTENERS AND COVERS, SELF-ADJUSTING CHAIN TENSIONERS, COMPENSATING ENGINE COVERS FASTENERS AND COVERS, SELF-ADJUSTING CHAIN TENSIONERS, COMPENSATING ENGINE SPROCKET MITTS, CLUTCH PUSHRODS, CLUTCH PRESSURE PLACES, ADJUSTABLE CLUTCH HUB RETAINERS, HUB LINERS AND HUB BEARINGS, CLUTCH CABLE ADJUSTING SLEEVES, CLUTCH AND BRAKE ADJUSTERS, HUB LINERS AND HUB BEARINGS, CLUTCH CABLE ADJUSTING SLEEVES, CLUTCH AND BRAKE ADJUSTERS, CLUTCHES, DISC BRAKE HUB SPACERS, SWITCH HOUSING AND MASTER CYLINDER COVER MOUNTING SCREWS, FRONT HAND BRAKE PIVOT PIN RETAINING RINGS, BRAKE LINE FITTINGS, REAR BRAKE FITTINGS, FRONT BRAKE CALIPER PINS, CALIPER MOUNTING PIN REBUILD KITS COMPRISING BRAKE PAD PINS, CALIPER MOUNT BUSHINGS, MOUNTING STUD, LOCKNUT AND WASHERS; CALIPER MOUNT BUSHINGS; CALIPER ANTI-VIBRATION KITS COMPRISING SPRING BRACKET AND FASTENER, CALIPER COVERS, FRONT BRAKE DISC COVERS, DISC BRAKE ROTOR MOUNTING KITS COMPRISING FASTENERS, REPAIR KITS FOR STRIPPED BLEEDER SCREWS COMPRISING TWO PIECE PRECISION MACHINED PARTS REPLACING STRIPPED BLEEDER SCREW, BRAKE HOSE KITS COMPRISING HOSE AND COMPRESSION FITTINGS, BRAKE PEDAL RETAINING RINGS, BRAKE LEVER RETURN SPRINGS, ALLEN HEAD POWERTRAIN ASSEMBLY SETS COMPRISING ALLEN HEAD SCREWS; FASTENERS, NAMELY, KNURLED VALVE STEM CAPS | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NORTON AMERICA, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Emery, Susan, Miriam
- Other trademarks owned by Emery, Leslie, John
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named DOMINATOR
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 28, 2006 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2006 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNSL | SU - SUSPENSION LETTER - WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |