Drawing for IVC INDUSTRIAL VIBRATION CONSULTANTS, INC.

USPTO serial 78287436

IVC INDUSTRIAL VIBRATION CONSULTANTS, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3152752Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 10, 2006
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IVC INDUSTRIAL VIBRATION CONSULTANTS, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theodore D. Lienesch

Theodore D. Lienesch THOMPSON HINE LLP10050 Innovation Drive, Suite 400Miamisburg, OH 45342-4934UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037maintenance and repair services, namely, balancing of rotating equipment and alignment of couplings, mill housing and total mill layouts in industrial manufacturing plants and facilitiesEXPIRED—
042consultation, testing and diagnostic services in the field of performance analysis, benchmarking, vibration analysis, chatter analysis, torsional analysis and ultrasonic leak detection in stationary and rotating equipment in industrial manufacturing plants and facilitiesEXPIRED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2017CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Oct 10, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2012NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 20128.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Nov 1, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 8, 20128.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Oct 8, 2012ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 28, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 5, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 3, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 3, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2006EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2005GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 26, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 6, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 5, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance