Drawing for FRESH WATCH CERTIFIED DELICIOUS

USPTO serial 78287499

FRESH WATCH CERTIFIED DELICIOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESH WATCH CERTIFIED DELICIOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rebecca Howard

Rebecca Howard Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.410 Swing RoadGreensboro, NC 27409UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Fresh fruits and vegetables; seeds for planting natural plants, fruits and flowersACTIVE—
044Agriculture, horticulture and forestry advice, namely, advising and consulting services in the field of plant growth and plant protectionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 5, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 5, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 31, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 31, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 31, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 8, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 4, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 15, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 1, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 20, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 31, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 1, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 9, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 23, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 28, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 17, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 11, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance