Drawing for JUST KIK-N-IT

USPTO serial 78287675

JUST KIK-N-IT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2980221Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 26, 2005
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUST KIK-N-IT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FARLEY I WEISS

ERIK M PELTONPO BOX 100637ARLINGTON, VA 22210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, hats and t-shirtsSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDJul 31, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2006C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Apr 5, 2006CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 23, 2006CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Feb 22, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2005PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 26, 2005R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jun 7, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2005CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 17, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance