Drawing for COUNTERCULTURE

USPTO serial 78287875

COUNTERCULTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with COUNTERCULTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Manny Pokotilow

MANNY POKOTILOW CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEIN, COHEN12TH FL SEVEN PENN CTR 1635 MARKETPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Kitchen products, namely, juice machines, electrical pasta makers for domestic use and electrical food processors, electric mixers, electric blenders, electric hand mixers, electric stand mixers, electric ice crushers, electric ice shavers, electric fruit and vegetable peelers, electric can openers and vacuum sealersABANDONED—
008Non-electrical pasta makers for domestic use, non-electric food processors, non-electric mixers, non-electric hand mixers,non-electric stand mixers, non-electric ice crushers, and tableware, namely knives, forks and spoonsABANDONED—
011Electrical skillets, electric rotisseries, electric deep fryers, electric pressure cookers, barbecue grills, electric toasters, electric toaster ovens, electric coffee makers, electric slow-cook casseroles, electric woks, electric frying pans, electric grills, electric griddles, outdoor electric grills, smokeless barbeque grills, convention ovens for domestic use, microwave ovens for cooking, electric waffle irons, electric rice cookers and electric food steamersABANDONED—
021Stainless steel non-stick cookware, stainless steel cookware, aluminum enamel coated non-stick cookware and anodized aluminum cookware all composed of pots, pans, saute pans, fry pans, stock pots, sauce pans, woks, colanders, non-electric food steamers, stove top grills and griddles, stainless steel and aluminum bakeware; namely, cookie sheets, cake pans, muffin and pie pans, loaf pans, roast pans, pizza pans and expandable cake pans, tea kettles, wok, fry pans, cork screws, ice cream scoops, garlic press, stainless steel and polyurethane/plastic spatulas, whisks, tongs, ladlesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 23, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 23, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 23, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 25, 2005OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 19, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 14, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 13, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance