USPTO serial 78287891
BREEDING BY DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BREEDING BY DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
6708 PW Wageningen, NL
6708 PW Wageningen, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm J. Rich
Norm J. Rich Foley & Lardner LLP3000 K Street, N.W., Suite 500Washington, DC 20007-5143UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus and equipment for data processing, namely computers; medical and scientific imaging software; computer programs for acquisition, analysis and processing of scientific, pharmaceutical biological, biotechnological and veterinary information; software used for DNA analysis; pre-recorded computer programs containing research documents on sequences nucleic acids of plants, animals, human and micro-organisms; computer programs for acquisition, analysis and processing of data in the fields of plants and animals reproduction, medical care for humans and animals, of food production industry, for medico-legal, clinical diagnosis and research purposes; computer software for the analysis of nucleic acids and amino acids, namely for DNA identification, genotype determination, identification of DNA markers, determination of nucleic acid bases, tests based on an amino acid, a peptide or a protein, genetic tests, genome analysis, identity tests, kinship tests, quality testing, quality control, purity tests, determination of genetic characteristics, gene identification, physical and genetic mapping identification, and screening of genetic diseases, said software being used in the field of plants and animals reproduction, of medical cares for humans and animals, of food production industry, for medico-legal field, for clinical diagnosis and research purposes; databases recorded supports systems, namely, databases recorded support systems concerning Nucleic Acid sequences used for genetic characterization | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design services in science and technology; scientific research; research services and development of medical services, plant products and new varieties of plants, veterinary, pharmaceutical, biological, food production, gene therapy and biotechnology; biology research, biotechnology, chemistry, veterinary, food production research; vegetal research; chemical, biological and genetic analysis; laboratory services; engineering services; tests services, namely genetic tests services in the fields of biology, biotechnology, agronomy, veterinary, food and feed production, plants and animals breeding, medical, pharmaceutical, and health care; medico-legal services; nucleic acid sequence analysis in the field of plants and animals reproduction, micro organism testing; medical care for humans and animals, for medico-legal, clinical diagnosis and research purposes; diagnosis tests and tests on nucleic acids or amino acids, genetic tests; genome analysis; identity tests, kinship tests, quality testing, quality control, purity tests, determination of genetic characteristics, gene identification, physical and genetic mapping, identifying genetic diseases and phenotyping; computer programming for others; design and development of computing and software equipment for others; updating of software, installation of software, maintenance of software; rental of software; creation, reconstitution and maintenance of databases; industrial analysis and research services; certification services, namely certification of analysis in the field of biology, biotechnology, agronomy, veterinary, food and feed production, plants and animals breeding; medical; pharmaceutical; and health care; legal expert services; consultation services, advices and technical projects studies services in the above mentioned fields; nucleic acid sequence analysis in fields of plants and animals reproduction, micro organisms testing | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical services; consultation in field of the pharmacy; veterinary services; agricultural services, namely variety identification of seeds, plants, animals, acceleration of inbred conversions of plants and animals; horticultural services, namely variety identification of plants, acceleration of inbred conversions of plants and animals; forestry services, namely variety identification of plants and trees, acceleration of inbred conversions of plants and trees | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Keygene N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Keygene N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named BREEDING BY DESIGN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 23, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 3, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |