USPTO serial 78287895
EVERYTHING $299
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 12, 2005
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EVERYTHING $299?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles P. LaPolla,
CHARLES P LAPOLLA OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | JEWELRY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |