USPTO serial 78287978
VIAGFORCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIAGFORCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Herbal based liquid supplements containing natural ingredients sold in vials | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |