USPTO serial 78288408
ATHLETICBABY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 27, 2005
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ATHLETICBABY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Flower Mound, TX
Flower Mound, TX
DALLAS, TX
DALLAS, TX
DALLAS, TX
DALLAS, TX
DALLAS, TX
DALLAS, TX
DALLAS, TX
DALLAS, TX
Dallas, TX
Dallas, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Carstens
DAVID W CARSTENS CARSTENS & CAHOON LLPPO BOX 802334DALLAS, TX 75380-2334UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DVD products for infants, namely, pre-recorded DVDs featuring sports related activity, play, and information to appeal to infants and toddlers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tammy L. Nolan
- Other trademarks owned by Tammy L. Nolan
- Other trademarks owned by FOSTER, KAREN
- Other trademarks owned by FOSTER, KAREN
- Other trademarks owned by FOSTER, KAREN
- Other trademarks owned by FOSTER, KAREN
- Other trademarks owned by FOSTER, KAREN
- Other trademarks owned by FOSTER, KAREN
- Other trademarks owned by ATHLETIC BABY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ATHLETIC BABY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Karen Foster
- Other trademarks owned by Karen Foster
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ATHLETICBABY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |