USPTO serial 78288536
ROCKING PUPPY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3003035Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 27, 2005
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROCKING PUPPY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EL SEGUNDO, CA
EL SEGUNDO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL MOORE
MICHAEL MOORE MATTEL INC333 CONTINENTAL BLVDEL SEGUNDO, CA 90245-5012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOYS, GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, A DOLL ACCESSORY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 3, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |